The Feudalistic society of ours....................

In the world of economics, Karl Marx is seen as a moron, but i usually remember one of his theory 'The Theory of Evolution of Mankind" from nomads, pastorals to a civilized one.....He recited that a society crooses five stages of cilization

1. Pastoral society

2. Feudalism

3. Capitalism

4. Socialism

5. Communism

 

In India, constitutionally we are into a Socialist State, we have many parties reciting 'Samaajvad'...Socialism is nothing but State Feudalism..in my earlier blog i wrote" We have gone through a mixture of democracy and feudalism, the difference now is just that the ratio is changing and as everywhere in India the administration has failed to protect common masses, Indian democracy has failed to be functional. And this failure has turned into anarchy,"...This is when few armed people mock indian democracy, mock indian Judiciary....I see indian judiciary crippled enough, it is more like a business running there in the name of justice......

 

Feudalism has creeped into our common masses that we have started accepted it from the core of our hearts we dont elect politicians we elect our Arbitrary Diktats for whom the rule of law is nothing...While democracy in theory is all about “representation,” democracy in practice is about CREATING LAW. All this is “new law.” All these new laws are on the side of Tyranny.

 

As Mr. Sauvik Chakraverti Said:  The Law Protects Us All. 

 

People value law, and are scared of anarchy because they confuse Liberty with lawlessness, only because they feel that, without The Law, they would be at the mercy of every bully who came along. Unfortunately for them, The Law itself has been taken over by bullies. The Police are nothing but a bunch of bullies. As are the legislators, who use their powers for the purpose of "social control." And the professors of Law are all on the side of the bullies. They justify injustice. They teach their students to be slaves of The State. They know nothing of Liberty Under Law.

 

A Rule of Law Society is based on three pillars: Property, Contracts and Torts. Each of these pillars of The Law are meant for the protection and safety of the citizen. With his Property protected by Law, the citizen is secure, his possessions are securely his; and not only that, when he wills his property to his descendants, these descendants are secure and protected too. No bully can interfere and hijack property. As John Locke wrote in 1690: "Where there is no Property, there is no Justice." 

 

Thus, Singur and Nandigram are examples of bullies – or should I say thieves – taking over The Law. Likewise with Indira Gandhi's "nationalization" of coal mines, banks, insurance and Air India. In all these cases, to use Bastiat's words, "the Law is guilty of the very crimes it is meant to punish."

 

The Constitution of India must therefore be seen as an instrument for the benefit of thieves, for it does not protect private property. This is one pillar of The Law we Indians do not have.

 

Similarly, contracts are a means of protecting the individual who signs an agreement with another. People make long-term plans with others on the basis of signed agreements (which are solemn promises – or "covenants" in the old language) and The Law exists to see that these promises are kept. Note that contracts are "private law" in the precise sense that two private parties signed the contract, and it is binding on them both. The Law exists to protect these private parties. For example, take a rent contract: the lessor must hand over possession to the lessee under Law; and the lessee must pay his rent on time. The Law of Contracts protects them both.

 

In India, rent control legislation, labour legislation, and currency legislation all make a mockery of solemn contracts. So this is another protection we do not possess under Law. The bullies have taken over the land.

 

The purpose of Tort Law – which is the oldest law – is entirely the protection of the individual and his properties. If anyone causes damage or injury to anyone else, he must pay damages. In India, this vital pillar of The Law simply does not exist. You may be hit on the road by a car driven by a reckless driver, and break a few bones, but under our The Law, you can claim no damages as compensation. You may go blind drinking illicit hooch – but there is no damage that the bootlegger will be forced to pay you. Your building may collapse in the rains, but the builder will not pay damages. In all these instances, the criminal law will take over, the police will be called in – and these bullies will extort money from the tortfeasor, as in the case of the Bhopal Gas Tragedy, or the Uphaar cinema fire.

 

Indeed, when some of us speak of “governance” (as opposed to “government”) we refer precisely to this elusive Rule of Law. We call for a government that will provide governance. And by that we mean a political system in which No One Is Above The Law. We want a government that is impartial and unbiased, one that does not allow anyone, however high and mighty he may be, to escape The Law. 

 

Of course, this is a pipedream when politicians pass legislation binding on us all, when bureaucratic agencies empowered by “subordinate legislation” do the same in this “democratic” system in which netas and baboos consider The Law to be something that they have created, and not something that they are Under. These netas and baboos are NOT bound to be Under The Law. They are creators of laws, rules and regulations that “wee the sheeple” are under. The netas and baboos, as makers of law, consider themselves ABOVE THE LAW. This is the reality of Indian Democracy.

 

Wake Up!

 

We in India are NOT protected by The Law. In our land, none of the three pillars of Liberty Under Law exist. All Law is confused with Legislation – and all this legislation is aimed at "social control." This is why I say that bullies, tyrants and thieves have taken over The Law. 

 

Is this The Rule of Law?

 

Or is this Unlaw – the rule of arbitrary diktats?

 

Back to Talibanization

Two years ago I watched a documentary on taliban, it is a draconian state where the value of ladies is worse than slaves, they are beaten, and badly beaten, if any part of their body is seen to a male. and all their life they have to masquerade in their 'Burkah'.

Sounds similar when these fascists, Ram Sene activists, come up in the name of God and beat women in the pubs and ,the most appreciable,  three CMs back their leader Muthalik. And state acts as a shelter for these fascists. this ultimately shows the mental development of many of us beacuse ultimately it is we who select these morons.

"Our culture is endangered" they say........

The idols of Khajuraho, Ajanta and Allora are also depicting your culture........my answer to them.

Culture is not something that you draw some do's and dont's for the mankind and they will be followed till the doomsday. Culture is the process of cilization and it is always changing, changing with times, generations and pace. Culture can't be drawn as 'must do' guideline for everybody.

See we have changed so far from Dhoti to Jeans, chitthi to phone calls, Pali to Hinglish, from an agrarian to services oriented economy and so on. Culture is not at all a stagnant thing. And the concept of casino in our society was their even in 2400 BC and liquor has remained the favourite beverage of our gods too.

Then why it is always considered by our so called leading parties that it is the obligation of the state to refrain people from consumption of alchohol via strong state action. 

We have been given right of freedom and right of expression by our constitution, why always some people come and curb the freedom of those who are innocent, and later on they get bail and our impotent judiciary keeps them hearing on and on and case gets off. 

from last 20 centuries our society has remained patriarchial, male dominated.......now when times are changing girls are getting freedom from the paws of traditionalists, these fascists are pulling their legs back.

If boys have right to drink then why not girls, where has gone the promise for equality??? 

In metro cities there is one thing that is very tough to cope with, it is anonimity, howsoever you become rich you'll still be anonymous in the crowd. This makes life hectic at a point, where one finds a place to enjoy and feel free, if pubs are providing such place then what's the problem in it.

Pubs are really a place to enjoy, to be original and to freak out with friends.

and the best thing they serve is the gentry that goes into these pubs, better than those county men who are found uncontrollable after boozing.

This is same organization that used to beat girls and boys who unfortunately were talking before them, breaking restraunts and showrooms on valentine and killing innocent muslims in the name of Ram.

Youth! beware, this is a slap on the face of globalisation, entering a stream of people with closed mindset in our society, talking about swadesi and culture when their own progeny is into it.

I would appeciate the move to be done by a proffesor of IIM-Bangalore on valentine as a peace protest by making human chains of loving people...............

to all girls reading this blog CHEERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    

sorry for this much long gap

well!!!!! first of all sorry for a long time lag for the second blog. a lot of things have happened in between, Satyam's fall, Israeli attack, and Pakistan's U turn stabilisation of international politics i.e. obama's delegation and much more...........................................we have a lot of things to talk...due to tight schedule of my exams and other engagements too for next few days too I'll not be able to send posts........soon it will end and you'll find more food for thought to talk on.........................

Crippled Democracy

The hallmark of the governance is its credibility which in turn depends upon its integrity, accountability, transparency and delivery of justice. Has any government been able to bring social justice, social equality? Democracy can be defined as the form of government which is by the people, of the people and for the people. On the other hand anarchy is a state of disorder, chaos where no administration, no laws follow.

Democracy gives us a chance to improve many things which we lack in anarchy and monarchy like corruption, nepotism, favouritism, redtapism. Quite understandably, in Indian context, democracy is working like anarchy. We have three parallel governments judicial, executive and parliamentary. None of them has been able to maintain the decorum of Indian constitution.

Police’s duty is to maintain law and order, but rather than it they are found collecting traffic challans or protecting VIPs, rather than defending common man they found defending burglars, thieves, criminals, destroying evidences or sometimes creating fake witnesses. Politicians given utmost importance and even when the henchmen of these politicians commit crime, they are not even touched by police.

The worst thing that happens in our society is that we elect our so called leaders not because of their ideology or their works, but we elect them just because they belong to our caste and in anticipation that he will be giving some benefits to our caste.

Castism is dominating that much in soul of masses that it reflects in our elections also, our society elects even most corrupt or a even a criminal person for their own benefit. That is reflected even in politics of Haryana, Punjab, UP, Gujrat etc. the leaders elected become VIPs and even to meet them is beyond the reach of common man. They just work for the benefit of their caste and creed, that’s the mother of all problems

Everywhere the administration has been failed to deliver social protection, social justice, and social rights. As in case of Nandigram we saw the government was favouring its cadre. The statement of Buddadeb Bhattacharya was more astonishing”we paid them back in the same coin.” Are they running the government or they are running a cadre? This statement is the same as Modi gave during Godhara incident. West Bengal was considered most efficient state in terms of administration. If the chief of the ruling party gives the statement like this then what can we expect from others.

Coalition governments are also the outcome of this type of politics and for them benefit of their cadre is foremost and betterment of people of state is always secondary

The poor are the majority voters in the country, yet no government has taken care of them, they are still lagging behind the mainstream of the society. Their growing unrest, dissatisfaction, deprivation is resulting in form of crime and terrorism; in fact these are the breeding

The National Commission for Enterprises in Unorganized Sector headed by Justice Arjun Dev submitted a report on livelihood of people in India in 2007. It said that 77% of Indian population was living below twice the official poverty line or we can say Rs. 20 per day per capita. This poor and vulnerable segment of India numbers to 83.6 crore. The increasing discontent and marginalization in poor class becomes breeding ground for terrorism. The reducing human rights security and civil liberties are fuel for this menace.

Reduced social and economic equalities is one more solution of it. For states like UP, Orrisa, Bihar where there is upper class hierarchy, the spread of naxalism and discontent in lower class is indubitable. Government itself is giving a breeding ground to terrorism. Because even politics, administration and police are prominently dominated by upper class, so it results in people losing hope in legal system and administration. There is no hope of justice for these people because in judiciary there is a big ‘jam’ and also upper class hierarchy


The underbelly of capitalism has been failed to correct regional imbalances rather it has widened them. These imbalances- between advanced and backward and between town and country- keep pushing people from backward regions towards mirages of opportunities. Most of the cities sitting on the volcano of bad amenities and unsympathetic bureaucracy. This keeps multiplying the number of poor and creates armies of unemployed youth.


The majority of the cases that are being filed into the courts are related to money such as, theft, bungling, robbery, dacoity, ransom demanding etc. and majority of people who in jails are under trials. There is a big jam into the courts, police are involved in corruption, later delivery of justice, absolving of criminals due to lack of evidence has created a big dissatisfaction into the minds of people. Nobody fears of law because the kingpins of Indian polity would save them and lack of material evidence makes them confident too.

The dawn of year 2006 faced killing of 12 adivasis in Kalinganagar, Orrisa by the police who were protesting against the acquisition of their land. This Land Acquisition Act is being used as a tool by the government to exploit the masses. Is state meant for acquiring lands of the poor at throwaway prices? Is it the function of government? Is government for protection of masses or for to kill them brutally?

We are nowhere in human right development index, but we are shining in corruption index. It is not because our leaders are corrupted. They are so because a ‘corrupted’ also lies in the soul of the masses. The more we are racing ahead, the more we are getting communal. Dividing ourselves in the faulty lines of caste, creed, and religion.

The condition of education that our government provides to masses is very poor. According to estimates of NSSO in 2007 1 lakh schools in India do not have teachers, in 1.5 lakh schools there s only one teacher, 1.32 lakh schools are not built in a concrete building. The condition of government schools


Had it not been the case then there would have been no naxalist, no maoist, there would have been no corruption at all. The poor who elect the leaders would not have been inaccessible to the political VIPs. There would have been people’s participation in decision making. Democracy doesn’t mean that decision for whole the masses should be taken by a politician even when it is not in welfare of public. In the name of land acquisition they have pampered property dealers. In the name of god they have mislead the masses, and it goes countless.

We have gone through a mixture of democracy and feudalism, the difference now is just that the ratio is changing and as everywhere in India the administration has failed to protect common masses, Indian democracy has failed to be functional. And this failure has turned into anarchy, if not coped properly; it can even lead to a civil war.